Skip to main content

The Code Bottega® is a London-based web development studio crafting sophisticated, high-performance digital solutions for luxury real estate, hospitality, and premium e-commerce brands

Industries

Services

  • WordPress Development
  • Shopify Development
  • React Development
  • Full Stack Development

Project Inquiries

Let's Talk

General Inquiries

linda@thecodebottega.com
| Linda Pozzato

Luxury Real Estate Website Examples: 9 UK and European Agencies, Measured

A wooden studio desk with a laptop and a tablet showing a Tuscan stone villa among cypress trees, beside a printed property brochure and a linen notebook.

The best luxury real estate website examples in the UK and Europe right now are The Modern House, Knight Frank and Barnes: each pairs a strong brand with a home page that real visitors load quickly. Romolini, Domus Nova and Beauchamp are worth studying for one standout idea each, but all three fail Google's real-user test. We read nine luxury agency home pages on 10 November 2026 and measured every one with Google PageSpeed Insights, so you can check each verdict below yourself.

The short version

  • Only 3 of the 9 home pages (The Modern House, Knight Frank and Barnes) passed Google's Core Web Vitals with real visitors when we measured them with Google PageSpeed Insights on 10 November 2026 (each report is linked under its site).
  • None scored 90 or more, Google's "good" band, in the mobile lab test on 10 November 2026. The best lab score, Romolini's 69, still failed with real users (our results).
  • The lab score and the real-user verdict often disagree: on 10 November 2026 Romolini scored 69 and failed, while Knight Frank scored 46 and passed (our results). When they do, trust the real-user data: it is what your visitors actually got.
  • 8 of the 9 sites run a journal, guides or market reports (our feature check, 10 November 2026). For luxury agencies, editorial is now expected, not a bonus.
  • Only 6 of the 9 put a valuation or appraisal request on the home page or in the main menu (same check, 10 November 2026), even though sellers are the clients these sites exist to win.
  • Two home pages, Domus Nova (55 MB) and Romolini (53.2 MB), loaded more than 50 MB in the lab test on 10 November 2026 (results). Big photography belongs on a luxury site; sending it at full size to a phone does not.

How we chose and measured these sites

We picked nine agencies that sell prime and luxury homes in the UK, Italy, France and Switzerland, mixing household names with independents, because almost every list on page one of Google is built from US agents and templates. We have no business relationship with any of them. One Spanish agency was dropped because its site blocked our reader, and we only describe pages we could read.

On 10 November 2026 we did two things for each site:

  1. Read the home page and main menu and noted what a buyer or seller can do there, and which structured data the page carries.
  2. Ran the home page through Google PageSpeed Insights, which gives two kinds of result. The lab score (0 to 100) comes from Lighthouse (version 13.6.0 on the day) loading the page on a simulated phone. The real-user figures come from the Chrome UX Report: what actual Chrome visitors experienced over the previous 28 days, at the 75th percentile.

A home page passes Core Web Vitals when, for most visitors, the main content appears within 2.5 seconds (Largest Contentful Paint, LCP), the page reacts to a tap within 200 milliseconds (Interaction to Next Paint, INP) and the layout barely jumps (Cumulative Layout Shift, CLS, of 0.1 or less). Google's PageSpeed documentation, checked on 10 November 2026, calls a lab score of 90 or more good, 50 to 89 "needs improvement" and under 50 poor.

Scores move a few points between runs, so read these as a snapshot of one day, not a permanent grade. We have not reproduced screenshots of other agencies' sites: each entry links the live site and its PageSpeed report, which shows the page as Google's test loaded it.

The results at a glance

Three of the nine passed with real visitors and six failed when we ran them through PageSpeed Insights on 10 November 2026; each site's own report is linked in its entry below.

Scorecard of nine luxury agency home pages: mobile lab score from 26 to 69, real-user LCP, INP and CLS, and the Core Web Vitals verdict, with only The Modern House, Barnes and Knight Frank passing
The lab score and the real-user verdict tell different stories: the top lab score failed, and a site scoring 46 passed.
Mobile home page results, measured 10 November 2026
SiteCountryLab scoreLCPINPCLSVerdict
RomoliniIT692.6 s172 ms0.03Fail
The Modern HouseUK671.7 s121 ms0.00Pass
BarnesFR541.8 s121 ms0.00Pass
Knight FrankUK461.5 s183 ms0.01Pass
Domus NovaUK343.8 s180 ms0.00Fail
LionardIT324.2 s467 ms0.37Fail
Great EstateIT311.5 s192 ms0.24Fail
Cardis (whole-site data)CH314.5 s127 ms0.00Fail
BeauchampFR263.5 sno data0.83Fail

Luxury real estate website examples: the nine sites

Sites that passed with real users come first; within each group, sites are listed by country (UK, Italy, Switzerland, France). Each entry says what the site does well, the one thing we would fix first, and what we measured, with a link to the PageSpeed report so you can rerun it.

1. The Modern House (UK): the agency that reads like a magazine

The Modern House sells design-led homes across the UK, and its home page opens with a story, not a search box: a journal feature on one house, then Prime, New, Featured and Past Sales rows.

What works: the proof is built into the page. Press quotes from the Evening Standard, GQ and Gentleman's Journal sit between the listings, past sales show the agency's track record, and "How much is my home worth?" catches sellers halfway down. It is the clearest example here of a brand that sells by taste.

What we'd fix: our check of the home page on 10 November 2026 found no structured data. Adding Organization or RealEstateAgent markup is a small job that helps Google and AI assistants describe the agency correctly.

Measured: mobile lab score 67, desktop 93. Real users: LCP 1.7 s, INP 121 ms, CLS 0, so it passes. Our check detected Next.js (PageSpeed report, 10 November 2026).

2. Knight Frank (UK): search built around how buyers dream

Knight Frank is the big-brand entry, and its best idea is the search: alongside the usual filters, buyers can start from Thameside, mews, lateral living, properties with land, swimming pools, London commute or Alpine chalets.

What works: these lifestyle searches match how a wealthy buyer actually briefs an agent ("a lateral flat by the river"), and each one is its own page that can rank. "Book a valuation" sits in the header, a market selector covers, by Knight Frank's own count on 10 November 2026, 52 markets and 25 languages, and research such as The Wealth Report gives the brand authority no listing page can.

What we'd fix: the real-user INP is 183 ms against a 200 ms limit (report, 10 November 2026). The home page carries a large mega menu and a market selector; loading their code only when someone opens them is the kind of change that buys back headroom before taps start to feel slow.

Measured: mobile lab score 46, with a lab LCP of 15.1 s and 126 requests, yet real users pass: LCP 1.5 s, INP 183 ms, CLS 0.01 (PageSpeed report, 10 November 2026). This is the clearest case on the list of a poor lab score and a healthy real-world experience.

3. Barnes (France): built for the international buyer

Barnes is a French luxury network, and its site is built for a buyer who might be in Dubai, Geneva or New York.

What works: when we checked the Barnes home page on 10 November 2026, the header offered six languages, 15 currency options (Bitcoin included) and a square metres or square feet switch. "Passion" categories (vineyards, hunting estates, equestrian estates, yachts, classic cars) widen the brand beyond houses, and magazines and market studies feed the editorial side.

What we'd fix: when we loaded the main address it served the French version. An English-speaking buyer arriving from a link has to find the switcher first; detecting the browser language, or a clear choice on arrival, removes that step.

Measured: mobile lab score 54 with 207 requests. Real users pass: LCP 1.8 s, INP 121 ms, CLS 0 (PageSpeed report, 10 November 2026).

4. Domus Nova (UK and Ibiza): the best editorial, the heaviest page

Domus Nova sells design-led homes in London and Ibiza, and nobody on this list writes better about property.

What works: listings read like short reviews and often name the architect or interior designer behind the house. Behind that sit a Journal, a Magazine, a Design Directory, Films and neighbourhood guides for London and Ibiza, in English and Spanish. That is a content library most agencies never build, and every page of it can be found on Google.

What we'd fix: the lab test on 10 November 2026 loaded 55 MB across 318 requests on the home page, and real users wait 3.8 s for the main content. Serving each image at the size the screen needs and loading films only when someone presses play would keep the look and lose most of the weight.

Measured: mobile lab score 34. Real users: LCP 3.8 s (fails), INP 180 ms, CLS 0 (PageSpeed report, 10 November 2026).

5. Romolini (Tuscany and Umbria): the brief-led enquiry

Romolini sells country houses, castles and wine estates in central Italy and, according to its own menu, is affiliated with Christie's International Real Estate.

What works: next to the search sits "describe the property you are looking for", a form that lets a buyer send a brief instead of scrolling. For homes that rarely come to market, that is a smarter lead than a saved search. Collections by region, area (Chianti, Val d'Orcia), type and lifestyle, a video tour channel and a sold archive round it out, in Italian, English and German.

What we'd fix: real-user LCP is 2.6 s, just past the 2.5 s line, and the lab test loaded 53.2 MB (report, 10 November 2026). Shrinking the first images could well be enough to tip it into a pass.

Measured: mobile lab score 69, the best of the nine, yet it fails with real users on LCP alone: LCP 2.6 s, INP 172 ms, CLS 0.03 (PageSpeed report, 10 November 2026).

6. Lionard (Florence): curation and languages at scale

Lionard sells villas, castles and estates across Italy, and its home page leads with three hero homes, each with a "Live tour video".

What works: curated collections such as "Best castles in Italy" turn a large portfolio (the Lionard search showed 1,843 properties on 10 November 2026) into something browsable. The site offers 20 languages and four currencies, plus a wishlist, which suits an audience that is mostly abroad.

What we'd fix: responsiveness. Real users wait 467 ms for the page to react to a tap, more than twice Google's 200 ms limit, and the layout shifts (CLS 0.37; report, 10 November 2026). A script audit comes before any redesign here.

Measured: mobile lab score 32, desktop 30. Real users: LCP 4.2 s, INP 467 ms, CLS 0.37, failing all three (PageSpeed report, 10 November 2026).

7. Great Estate (Italy): every tool a seller could want

Great Estate is a network of Italian agencies, and its site is the most complete on the list: it ticked all five features we checked for.

What works: buyers can filter by media (virtual tour, professional video). Sellers get an online valuation and a "potential buyers report", and WhatsApp and phone sit one tap away. In our check on 10 November 2026 it was also the only site of the nine with RealEstateAgent structured data on its home page, which tells search engines exactly what the business is.

What we'd fix: layout shift. Real users load the main content in 1.5 s, but the page jumps as it settles (CLS 0.24 against a 0.1 limit; report, 10 November 2026). Reserving space for images and banners before they load usually solves it.

Measured: mobile lab score 31, with a lab LCP of 24.4 s. Real users: LCP 1.5 s, INP 192 ms, CLS 0.24, failing on CLS (PageSpeed report, 10 November 2026). We tested great-estate.it, which redirects to greatestate.it.

8. Cardis (Switzerland): new developments done properly

Cardis sells homes and new developments around Lake Geneva, from offices in Lausanne, Nyon and Montreux.

What works: each development has its own page with a delivery date (Givrins, 2028, for example), which is what an off-plan buyer needs to see first. "Planifiez un rendez-vous" (book an appointment) lets visitors book a meeting online, and the valuation request sits in the header.

What we'd fix: loading speed. Across the whole site, real users wait 4.5 s for the main content, well past the 2.5 s limit (report, 10 November 2026).

Measured: mobile lab score 31. Real users, whole site (the home page alone had too little data): LCP 4.5 s, INP 127 ms, CLS 0 (PageSpeed report, 10 November 2026).

9. Beauchamp (French Riviera): a model for area pages

Beauchamp sells villas and apartments in Cannes, Mougins, Saint-Tropez and Saint-Jean-Cap-Ferrat, with links through to Beauchamp Estates in London, Marbella and Mykonos.

What works: the site architecture. Cannes alone is split into pages for Californie, Basse Californie, la Croisette, Super Cannes and more, so the site can answer very specific searches. Buyer guides ("12-Step Process for Buying Property in France", English-speaking notaries) answer the questions foreign buyers actually ask, and the home page carries structured data for places, people, articles and video.

What we'd fix: the page jumps. Real-user CLS is 0.83, more than eight times the 0.1 limit (report, 10 November 2026), so content moves under people's fingers as it loads.

Measured: mobile lab score 26, the lowest of the nine. Real users: LCP 3.5 s and CLS 0.83. INP had too little data, so under Google's assessment rules the page is judged on LCP and CLS alone, and it fails on both (PageSpeed report, 10 November 2026).

What do the best luxury real estate websites have in common?

The best luxury real estate websites lead with one property or one story, give buyers several ways in, make the seller's next step obvious and publish something worth reading. Here is what we saw across the nine. Video is the rarest feature, and the cheapest to add: even a short tour made from listing photos with our free property video maker beats none.

Matrix of nine agency sites against five features: valuation request on 6 of 9, journal or guides on 8 of 9, more than one language on 7 of 9, favourites or alerts on 6 of 9, video tours on 4 of 9
Editorial is nearly universal; video tours and a visible seller path are not.
Features seen on the home page or main menu, 10 November 2026
SiteValuationJournalLanguagesFavouritesVideo
The Modern HouseYesYesYes
Knight FrankYesYesYesYes
BarnesYesYesYesYes
Domus NovaYesYesYesYes
RomoliniYesYesYesYes
LionardYesYesYes
Great EstateYesYesYesYesYes
CardisYesYes
BeauchampYesYes
Sites with it6 of 98 of 97 of 96 of 94 of 9

Editorial is expected

Eight of the nine publish a journal, buyer guides or market research (our feature check, 10 November 2026). At this price point buyers take months to decide, and an agency that writes well about houses and areas stays in their tabs. It is also how these sites rank for searches that are not just an address.

Beauchamp's neighbourhood pages, Domus Nova's area guides and Knight Frank's lifestyle searches all do the same job: one page per thing a buyer might type. If your site has one "Properties" page and a filter, you are invisible for most of those searches.

The seller path is weaker than it should be

A luxury agency's site has two audiences: buyers browsing and owners deciding who to instruct. As our feature check on 10 November 2026 shows, a third of these sites put no valuation or appraisal request on the home page or in the main menu. The owner of a house worth several million is judging your website before they call; give them a clear way to ask.

Here is the home page we would build

Put together, the strongest parts of these nine sites make a simple order of play.

Six stacked blocks of a luxury agency home page in order: hero, search or collections, seller path, proof, editorial and areas, contact, each paired with a site from the article
Six blocks, top to bottom, each borrowed from a site above.
  1. Hero: one property or story, one line on who you are (The Modern House, Lionard).
  2. Search or collections: ways in that match how buyers think (Knight Frank lifestyle searches).
  3. Seller path: a visible valuation or appraisal request (6 of the 9 sites).
  4. Proof: past sales, press, reviews (The Modern House).
  5. Editorial and areas: journal, guides, one page per neighbourhood (Beauchamp, Domus Nova).
  6. Contact: phone, WhatsApp, booking a meeting (Great Estate, Cardis).

Lab score or real users: which speed number should you trust?

Trust the real-user data first. It records what visitors actually experienced over the previous 28 days (Google's PageSpeed documentation), while the lab score is one simulated load on a slowed-down phone. In our results from 10 November 2026, the highest lab score (Romolini, 69) failed with real users, and Knight Frank passed with 46.

The lab still matters for two reasons. It shows you why a page is slow, which the real-user data cannot. And it is the only number you get for a new site or a quiet page, because Chrome needs enough visitors before it reports anything. Cardis's home page, for example, had too little traffic of its own, so PageSpeed fell back to whole-site figures.

We see the same three causes again and again in this niche. Luxury sites fail on weight (full-size photography and autoplay film), on layout shift (banners and images that load without reserved space) and on responsiveness (too many scripts). None of that is a design problem. A site can look exactly like Domus Nova or The Modern House and still pass, which is why we build speed into the first version rather than fixing it after launch.

How to check your own luxury real estate website in ten minutes

Paste your home page into PageSpeed Insights, read the real-user verdict first, then check your busiest listing. It is free and takes ten minutes.

  1. Open PageSpeed Insights and paste your home page address.
  2. Read the top section first, "Discover what your real users are experiencing". If it says "Passed", your visitors are fine on that page.
  3. If it failed, note which of the three figures is red or amber: LCP (loading), INP (responding to taps) or CLS (jumping).
  4. Scroll to the lab diagnostics to see the likely causes, such as oversized images or heavy scripts.
  5. Repeat for your busiest property page, not just the home page. That is where buyers spend their time.
  6. Then read your home page as an owner would: is there a clear way to ask for a valuation without scrolling?

When a new website is not the answer

Not every agency needs a rebuild. If your real-user data passes and sellers can find the valuation request, spend the money on photography and writing instead. Most of what makes these nine sites good is content, not code.

If you are a small agency with a handful of listings, a well-chosen builder can carry you for a while; our shortlist of real estate website builders covers the ones we checked, and builders versus a custom build explains where each one stops. If you are choosing who should build it, our guide to real estate website designers compares studios and platforms honestly.

A bespoke build earns its cost when the site is how you win instructions: when you need area pages at scale, several languages, a property feed from your CRM and the portals on your own domain, and pages that pass with real users. That is the work we do in our real estate website design service. On Affitti.ch, for example, we took over a half-finished Swiss property site, made it faster, and added custom features, landing pages and an SEO plan.

Your next step

Run your home page and your busiest listing through PageSpeed Insights this week and compare them with the table above. If you pass, you are ahead of most of these nine. If you do not, the fixes are usually specific and finite, and we are happy to tell you which ones matter first.

Luxury real estate websites: more questions

Get in touch with us

Contact Us

Is your site fast for real buyers?

Tell us about your agency and your website. On a short discovery call we will go through what is holding it back and what a fix or a rebuild would involve, then send an itemised quote with no surprise fees.